Legal Opinion · Dissent

Estate of Fowler v. Perry

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 18, 1997No. 10A01-9608-CV-268Published

1DissentBaker, Judge

In reaching its conclusion that the trial court properly denied probate of an original duplicate of Fowler’s will, the majority relies on the rule that where a testator retains possession or control of a will and the will is not found at the testator’s death, a presumption arises that the will was destroyed with the intent to revoke it. Because I believe that the application of this presumption in the instant case overrides the clear intent of the testator and is questionable when the testator executes a duplicate original, I respectfully dissent.

The paramount objective behind the law of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Stiles v. BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 1980
  2. McDonald v. McDonaldIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Matter of Estate of WaltersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. Matter of Estate of ShawSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
  5. Payne v. PayneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1972

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API