Matter of Estate of Shaw
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
DOOLIN, Justice:
We granted certiorari in this matter in response to an application under Rule 3.14 A(l), 12 Ch. 15 App. 3. 1 We are called upon to decide and rule that a presumption of revocation of a will arises from failure to account for or to produce all copies of executed duplicate wills.
The facts reveal decedent, Shaw, went to his family lawyer for the purpose of making a will. In due time a will was prepared and executed in duplicate. At the time of execution the lawyer explained the purpose of duplicate wills was, in the event either was misplaced, lost or accidentally destroyed, a…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Estate of JanesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Hood v. Lawrence National BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1968
- Estate of BarnesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- Henderson v. SnowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- White v. Brennan's Adm'rCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1948
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Speers v. SpeersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008
- In Re the Estate of MetteeCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1985
- Goodwin v. Estate of GoodwinCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2000
- Matter of Estate of ShawCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1980
- ESTATE OF CUNNINGHAM v. CHERYL MOORESupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2025
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.