Legal Opinion

Sourgoutsis v. United States Capitol Police

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided July 20, 2021No. Civil Action No. 2016-1096Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) CHRISAVGI SOURGOUTSIS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 16-cv-1096 (KBJ) ) UNITED STATES CAPITOL POLICE, ) ) Defendant. ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS On June 13, 2016, Plaintiff Chrisavgi Sourgoutsis initiated the instant legal action against the United States Capitol Police (“USCP”), alleging that USCP had discriminated and retaliated against her, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as incorporated by the Congressional Accountability Act,

2 U.S.C. § 1301

et seq. (See…

2Cases cited10 opinions

Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
Theresa L. Sheppard v. Riverview Nursing Center, Incorporated, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Amicus CuriaeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
Gudenkauf v. Stauffer Communications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
Mike AKRABAWI, Plaintiff-Appellant, Cross-Appellee, v. CARNES COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
Norris v. Sysco Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.