Legal Opinion

State v. Allen

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided May 29, 1992No. 13819PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ALARID, Chief Judge.

Defendant appeals from his conviction as an accessory in cocaine trafficking. Our calendar notice proposed summary affirmance, and defendant responded with a memorandum in opposition. We have considered defendant’s arguments and are not persuaded. We affirm.

FACTS

Officer Dustin Peterson was working undercover. Peterson testified that he was looking for defendant’s brother when he met defendant. Defendant took Peterson into his house and offered to find a controlled substance for him. Defendant left his house and returned with his brother, who then sold cocaine to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lewis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Matter of Adoption of DoeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1984
  3. State v. HoxsieNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State v. SisnerosNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1982
  5. State v. Vann SuttonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. GomezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State v. PittmanNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. State v. PittmanNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API