Legal Opinion

Burk v. Unified School District No. 329

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided January 30, 1987No. Civ. A. No. 84-4235PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

EARL E. O’CONNOR, Chief Judge.

Pending before the court are the following motions: (1) defendants’ objections to the taxation of costs; (2) individual motions by the defendants Suzanna Sayler, John Bloomfield and Dave Hund for attorney’s fees; and (3) defendants’ request to approach jurors. This civil rights action was tried to a jury on October 14-28, 1986. At the close of the evidence, the court directed a verdict in favor of all of the individual defendants and in favor of the defendant Unified School District No. 329 [hereinafter the District] on plaintiff’s claims for…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Christiansburg Garment Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Roadway Express, Inc. v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Ramos v. LammCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
  4. Farmer v. Arabian American Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Miller v. City of Mission, Kan.District Court, D. Kansas · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. The American Insurance Company v. El Paso Pipe And Supply Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
  2. Green Construction Co. v. Kansas Power & Light Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1994
  3. All West Pet Supply Co. v. Hill's Pet Products DivisionDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1994
  4. Withrow v. CornwellDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1994
  5. Young v. RobertsDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API