Legal Opinion
Young v. Roberts
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided February 27, 1990No. 87-1407-CPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
CROW, District Judge.
The case comes before the court on the defendants’ motion, pursuant to D.Kan. Rule 219, for review and modification of the clerk’s taxation of costs. Defendants seek the addition of $182.50 for the cost incurred in hauling the plaintiff's truck from Pratt to Wichita for the jury’s viewing. One morning of the trial, the jury was permitted to view the truck which was displayed sitting on the west yard of the courthouse. Plaintiff opposes the additional cost as not within the express terms of the statute and as unnecessary to the jury’s decision.
The court…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Farmer v. Arabian American Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Eugene A. Wahl and Vibra Screw Feeders, Inc., and Cross-Appellees v. Carrier Manufacturing Co., Inc., and Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975
- Studiengesellschaft Kohle Mbh, as Trustee for the Max-Planck-Institut Fur Kohlenforschung v. Eastman Kodak CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
- True Temper Corporation, and Cross-Appellee v. Cf&i Steel Corporation, and Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979
- U.S. Industries, Inc. v. Touche Ross & Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Manildra Milling Corp. v. Ogilvie Mills, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1995