Legal Opinion
Janice H. Kelley v. Integon Indemnity Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided March 12, 1984No. 83-8529PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VANCE, Circuit Judge:
In this case we are asked to decide whether the Georgia Motor Vehicle Accident Reparations Act, Ga.Code Ann. § 33-34-1 et seq. (1982) restricts recovery of benefits for accidents arising from the permissive use pf insured motor vehicles to pedestrians struck by motor vehicles and individuals who were occupying the vehicles in question when injury befell them. We believe this question is appropriate for resolution by the Supreme Court of Georgia. The record establishes that this issue arises with frequency. The intermediate Georgia state court has reached conflicting…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Eusebio M. Martinez, Father of Jacqueline M. Martinez, a Minor, Deceased v. Jose Rodriquez and Antonio Rodriquez, D/B/A Ingram Court ApartmentsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
- Clinton v. National Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
- Georgia Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
- Jones v. TRANSAMERICA INSURANCE COMPANYCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
- Parker v. ATLANTA CASUALTY COMPANYCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Penn Mutual Life Insurance v. AbramsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- Beard v. VieneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
- Janice H. Kelley v. Integon Indemnity CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
- Penn Mutual Life Insurance v. AbramsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987