Legal Opinion
Parker v. ATLANTA CASUALTY COMPANY
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided February 16, 1981No. 61470PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Deen, Presiding Judge.
Parker appeals from the grant of a summary judgment to the defendant whose insurance policy with Parker contained PIP, no-fault insurance protection. The conditions of the policy coincide with Code Chapter 56-3402b. The facts, as set forth in Parker’s affidavit and subsequent deposition are as follows: Plaintiff was an employee of an automobile repair shop, and was asked to bring in an automobile from the lot outside in order that a stero might be installed. He drove the car into the building, some 100 feet or so, stopped.it, cut off the switch, and stepped out. Upon…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
- Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
- Vesely v. Prestige Casualty Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1972
- Flores v. Dairyland County Mutual Insurance Co. of TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980
- Oregon Mutual Insurance v. FonzoCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Texas Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. v. SturrockTexas Supreme Court · 2004
- Kelley v. Integon Indemnity Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1984
- Cole v. New Hampshire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
- Jones v. Continental InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
- Georgia Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.