Legal Opinion

State v. Allard

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 22, 1996No. 95-1060PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.

Appellant presents a number of issues for our consideration. (See Appendix, infra.) We have carefully considered each of appellant’s propositions of law and have independently reviewed appellant’s death sentences for appropriateness and proportionality. For the reasons that follow, we affirm the judgment of the court of appeals and uphold the sentences of death.

I

R.C. 2929.05 requires this court to review capital cases in a certain manner. However, we have held, in a series of prior cases, that R.C. 2929.05 does not require this court to address and discuss, in opinion form, each and every…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Wainwright v. WittSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Morgan v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. State v. CookOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  5. State v. MorelandOhio Supreme Court · 1990

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. State v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State v. TreeshOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  3. State v. MurphyOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  4. State v. TaylorOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State v. RobertsOhio Supreme Court · 2006

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API