Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Cali

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 28, 1923PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBraley, J.

The defendant having been indicted, tried and convicted under G. L. c. 266, § 10, of burning a building in Leominster belonging to Maria Cali, which at the time was insured against loss or damage by fire, with intent to injure the insurer, the case is here on his exceptions to the denial of his motion for a directed verdict, and to rulings at the trial.

It is contended, that there was no evidence that the building was insured by a valid policy at the time it was burned. But it was uncontroverted that when the defendant was the owner he mortgaged the property to the Fitchburg Cooperative Bank…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Palmer Savings Bank v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1896
  2. People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Commonwealth v. AsherowskiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
  4. Commonwealth v. KaplanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
  5. People v. HaxerMichigan Supreme Court · 1906

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Opinion of the Justices to the Senate & the House of RepresentativesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
  2. Commonwealth v. LevesqueMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
  3. Commonwealth v. VellucciMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  4. Commonwealth v. AlbaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
  5. Commonwealth v. Dung Van TranMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2012

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API