Overstreet v. Rhodes

Head, Justice.

The' application for certiorari which was granted by this court contains three assignments of error. In ground 1 it is insisted that the decision of the Court of Appeals (Overstreet v. Rhodes, 94 Ga. App. 750) is contrary to law and contrary to the decision of this court, because the Court of Appeals held that the trial court “did not err in denying the motion for new trial and the motion for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict,” for the sole reason that the court was “of the opinion *183that the jury was authorized to find that the repairing of the premises would have…