Legal Opinion

Moore v. Cohen.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 28, 1901PublishedCited by 13 opinions

ActioN by J. E. Moore against Charles Cohen, beard by Judge H. R. Siarbuch and a jury, at March Term, 1900, of tbe Superior Court of Halifax: County. From a judgment for the defendant, tbe plaintiff appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtClare, J.

Tbis is an action by tbe plaintiff for malicious prosecution by illegally causing tbe arrest of plaintiff in a former action in wbicb tbe present defendant was one of tbe plaintiffs, and obtained judgment against tbe present plaintiff, wbo was one of the defendants.

It was admitted by both parties that tbe claim on wbicb tbe judgment was rendered was sent by Coben & Son, of wbicb firm defendant is senior partner, to R. B. Peebles, attorney-at-law, for collection, with no specific instruction as to collection, and in tbe usual course of business for collection; that before sending it Coben &…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Welsh v. . CochranNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  2. Fire Ass'n v. FlemingSupreme Court of Georgia · 1887

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Daniel v. RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  2. Dickerson v. . Refining Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  3. Jackson v. Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  4. Parrish v. Boysell Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  5. Neal v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1900

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API