Krumpen v. Taylor
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Hart, C. J.,
(after stating the facts). At the outset it may be stated that, under our statute regulating the .liquidation of insolvent banks, orders for sales of the assets of an insolvent bank may be made and confirmed by the chancery court in vacation without notice. Section 720 of Crawford & Moses’ Digest; and Supplement to Crawford & Moses’ Digest by Castle, § 719; Acts of 1921, p. 514; Barham v. Crittenden County Bank, 170 Ark. 77, 278 S. W. 696. This holding' was recognized and approved by the court in State use of Crawfordsville Special School District v. Huxtable, 178 Ark. 361, 12 S.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bank of Commerce v. GoolsbySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1917
- Bank of Dermott v. MeaselSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1926
- Bank of Manila v. WallaceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
- State Use Crawfordsville Special School District v. HuxtableSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
- Barham v. Crittenden County BankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1926