Legal Opinion

United States v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

District Court, E.D. Oklahoma

Decided September 3, 1938No. 6451PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RICE, District Judge.

Briefly the facts out of which this controversy arose are as follows: In 1902 the trustees for the Choctaw and Chickasaw Nations executed two certain coal mining leases to the Kansas and Texas Coal Company. 'These leases by assignment became the property of the Central Coal and Coke Company. At the time of the execution of the leases the United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company, a corporation, executed a bond in the sum of $75,000 conditioned upon the faithful performance by the lessee of the conditions named in the leases. The surety company agreed to the various…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Schillinger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Cook County National Bank v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  3. United States v. ChaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  4. Townsend v. LittleSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  5. United States v. MinnesotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1926

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. DavisIllinois Supreme Court · 1993
  2. United States v. HeardDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1940
  3. United States v. Marin Rock and Asphalt CompanyDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1969
  4. United States v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939
  5. Crockett v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API