Legal Opinion

Baumhart v. McClure

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided April 22, 1926PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichards, J.

This action involves the title to lot 434 in the village of Vermilion, and also the right to use a vacated alley, extending north and south along the east side of said lot and adjoining lots, to Lake street, now vacated, and a claim to have an obstruction removed extending into said street. The plaintiff appealed from the decree rendered in the court of common pleas. -

The case naturally divides itself into two branches: First, relating to the title to lot 434; and, second, the right to use the vacated alley and street. These questions will be disposed of in their order.

In 1837 the lot…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mulry v. . NortonNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  2. City of Chicago v. WardIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Fowler v. WoodSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
  4. Gilbert v. EldridgeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
  5. Randolph v. HinckIllinois Supreme Court · 1917

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. BD. OF TRUSTEES OF INTERNAL IMP. TR. FUND v. Sand Key Assoc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1987
  2. Klais v. DanowskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Leonard v. State Highway Dept. of NJNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954
  4. United States v. 461.42 Acres of Land in Lucas CountyDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1963
  5. Waynor v. DiboffDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1937

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API