Legal Opinion
Klais v. Danowski
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided July 8, 1964No. Calendar 2, Docket 49,728PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDethmers, J.
The paramount question is whether the area of the 2 lots, hereinafter described, is a part of the State-owned, nnpatented, submerged lands of the Great Lakes and, as such, subject to PA 1955, No 247, as amended by PA 1958, No 94 (CLS 1961, § 322.701 et seq. [Stat Ann 1958 Eev and Stat Ann 1963 Cum Supp § 13.700(1) et seq.]), which provides that occupants on unpatented, filled-in bottom of the Great Lakes may apply to the State for conveyances of the State’s interest therein and authorizes such conveyances to them, for a consideration, by the department of conservation.
Plaintiffs are…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Shively v. BowlbySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Knight v. United States Land Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
- United States v. Holt State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Brewer-Elliott Oil & Gas Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Mitchell v. SmaleSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Peterman v. Department of Natural ResourcesMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
- Flanders Industries, Inc. v. StateMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993
- Glass v. GoeckelMichigan Supreme Court · 2005
- Garrett v. StateNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1972
- Arnold v. EllisMichigan Court of Appeals · 1966
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.