Legal Opinion

Trautman v. Savin Copy Products

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 6, 1994PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

—Mercure, J.

Appeals from a decision and amended decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed September 10, 1991 and July 29, 1992, which directed that the award of workers’ compensation benefits be paid by the Special Fund for Reopened Cases.

The only issue that need be determined on these appeals is whether the finding of the Workers’ Compensation Board that the February 11, 1988 report of Mihai Dimancescu was not filed with the Workers’ Compensation Board within seven years of claimant’s January 8, 1982 accident (see, Workers’ Compensation Law § 25-a [1]) was unreasonable. In view of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bossuk v. SteinbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Claim of Allen v. Bausch & Lomb, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  3. Pucser v. Allegheny Ludlum Steel Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Elia v. Highland Central School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API