Legal Opinion
Padilla v. Porsche Cars N. Am., Inc.
District Court, S.D. Florida
Decided May 21, 2019No. Case Number: 18-24988-CIV-MORENOPublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FEDERICO A. MORENO, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Plaintiffs Santiago Padilla and Murray Shames (collectively, "Plaintiffs") filed a *1111Class Action Complaint against Defendant Porsche Cars North America, Inc. ("Porsche"), seeking declaratory relief and damages for alleged violations of the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act ("FDUTPA") and for breach of the implied warranty of merchantability under Florida law, based upon Porsche's alleged knowledge of an alleged safety defect in the cooling system of certain Porsche vehicle models. Porsche filed a Motion to Dismiss, asking the Court…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Brooks v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Florida, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
- Nicholas La Grasta, Domenico La Grasta, and Mauro La Grasta, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. First Union Securities, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
- Maynard v. Board of Regents of the Division of Universities of the Florida Department of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Bass v. General Motors, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2024
- Browning v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2021
- Chapman v. General Motors LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2021
- Diaz v. FCA US LLCDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2023
- Droesser v. Ford Motor CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2023
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.