Legal Opinion

State v. Risk

Utah Supreme Court

Decided March 14, 1974No. 13430PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ELLETT, Justice:

The appellant seeks a reversal of his conviction of automobile homicide, a felony, upon two assignments of reversible error, viz.:

1. That the trial court erred in refusing to instruct the jury as to the lesser included offense of negligent homicide.

2. That the trial court erred in instructing the jury as to the 0.08 alcohol-blood presumption of Utah Code Annotated, Sec. 41-6-44, in that said presumption applies only to the offense of driving under the influence of intoxicating liquor and not to the charged offense of automobile homicide.

There is no merit to the first…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. LingmanUtah Supreme Court · 1939
  2. State v. RomeroUtah Supreme Court · 1961

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. CazierUtah Supreme Court · 1974
  2. People v. DavisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1974
  3. State v. DurrantUtah Supreme Court · 1977
  4. State v. WadeUtah Supreme Court · 1977
  5. State v. CazierUtah Supreme Court · 1974

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API