Legal Opinion
Odum v. Newstadt's Shoe Stores
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided February 7, 1940No. 5955PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAMITER, Judge.
Defendants herein, being the commercial partnership of Newstadt Shoe Stores and the individual partners thereof, successfully .urged in the trial court an exception of no ■cause of action; and from the judgment ■dismissing her suit plaintiff appealed:
The allegations of fact of the petition, which are taken as true for the purpose of considering the case on the mentioned exception, disclose that plaintiff went into the store of defendants in Shreveport, Louisiana, on June 24, 1938, and asked ⅜0 be fitted with white, dress, high-heel pumps. She looked at many of them and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Louisiana Power & Light Co. v. SaiaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1937
- Pearlman v. Garrod Shoe Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1937
- Flotte v. Thomas Egan's Sons, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1931
- Flotte v. Thomas Egan's Sons, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1931
- Dubbs v. Zak Brothers Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1931
3Cited by9 opinions
- Arata v. Orleans Capitol Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1951
- Bolton v. North River Insurance CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1958
- Youngblood v. Newspaper Production CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1961
- Colclough v. Orleans Parish School BoardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1964
- Myers v. Traders & General Insurance CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1955
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.