Dubbs v. Zak Brothers Co.

- We are cited to the case of Gerkin vs Brown & S. Co., 177 Mich. 45, wherein the court allowed a recovery of damages against defendant for injuries, due to the dye on a fur- collar rubbing against, the neck of plaintiff and poisoning him. Quoting from the language of the court in said case:

■“When the fact is onqe established and 'demonstrated by experience that a certain commodity apparently harmless, contains concealed dangers, and when distributed to the public through the channels of trade, and used for the purposes for which it was made and' sold, is sure to cause suffering to, and…