Legal Opinion
Skerencak v. Fischman
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 28, 1995PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs and new trial granted on damages for future medical expenses only unless plaintiff, within 20 days of service of a copy of the order of this Court with notice of entry, stipulates to reduce the award of future medical expenses to $2,500 in which event the judgment is modified accordingly and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: In this podiatric malpractice action, Supreme Court did not err in allowing plaintiff to impeach defendant, whom she had called as a witness, with…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Kowalski v. Loblaws, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- Moore v. MaggioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Div-Com, Inc. v. F. J. Zeronda, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Allen v. HarringtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Guerin v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cramer v. KuhnsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Morency Ex Rel. Morency v. Horizon Transportation Services, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- Young v. Knickerbocker ArenaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Miller v. GallerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007