Legal Opinion

Guerin v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 15, 1925PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. A careful examination of this case reveals no error, except one, which we deem worthy of comment. The plaintiff’s mother was permitted to testify to a conversation which she said occurred after the accident, in which she claims she interrogated the street sweeper, and he admitted that he set the fire which caused plaintiff’s injuries. The admission of this testimony at that time was error. (Page v. Hirsch, 207 App. Div. 733-735; Hanrahan v. New York Edison Co., 238 N. Y. 194-198.) The plaintiff, however, had made out a ease at that time which…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hanrahan v. . New York Edison Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1924
  2. Page v. HirschAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Skerencak v. FischmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  2. Riccio v. H. S. Chardavoyne, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
  3. Stanley v. Surface Transit, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API