Legal Opinion

Cook v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 4, 2004Published

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to *425recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendants City of New York, Administration for Children’s Services, and Little Flower Children’s Services appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Schulman, J.), dated September 10, 2003, as granted that branch of the plaintiffs’ motion which was to vacate a 90-day notice to resume prosecution of the action.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs (see Cook v City of New York, 11 AD3d 424 [2004] [decided herewith]). Ritter, J.P., H. Miller,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cook v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API