Legal Opinion
Cook v. City of New York
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 4, 2004PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendants City of New York, Administration for Children’s Services, and Little Flower Children’s Services appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Schulman, J.), dated September 11, 2003, as granted that branch of the plaintiffs’ motion which was to vacate a 90-day notice to resume prosecution of the action.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in granting that branch of the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Carte v. SegallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Markarian v. HundertAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Conway v. Brooklyn Union Gas Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Dhaliwal v. Long Boat Taxi, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Florestal v. Little Flower Children's ServicesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
3Cited by3 opinions
- Oliver v. Town of HempsteadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Cook v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Foley v. West-Herr Automotive Group, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009