Legal Opinion

Zeta Building Corp. v. Garst

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided January 18, 1951No. 31710PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Simpson

April 4, 1946, plaintiff-appellee, Zeta Building Corporation, hereinafter called plaintiff, filed its suit in the circuit court of Champaign County for specific performance against George Garst, Barbara Garst, and Glenn T. Ross, trustee, hereinafter called defendants. Hattimay Leonard, as tenant of the premises in question, was made a defendant and later Hurley Feltman and Julius C. Kamin became defendants because of their alleged purchase of the premises from the Garsts. The circuit court decreed specific performance and this appeal followed, a freehold being involved.

The contract which it…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Palmer v. Meriden Britannia Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Brown v. JurczakIllinois Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Finley v. FelterIllinois Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Moses v. LoomisIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Plummer v. WorthingtonIllinois Supreme Court · 1926

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. People v. RobinsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
  2. Midland Electric Coal Corp. v. County of KnoxIllinois Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Tadros v. KuzmakAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995
  4. Vogel v. DawdyIllinois Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Ferrara v. CollinsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API