Legal Opinion

Guideone Mutual Insurance v. Utica National Insurance

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 28, 2013No. D059833PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

NARES, J.

This equitable contribution action involves three insurers, GuideOne Mutual Insurance Company (GuideOne), whose insurance policy covered an employee who negligently caused injuries to another person while driving his car in connection with business for his employer, Utica National Insurance Group and Graphics Art Mutual Insurance Company (collectively Utica), whose policies only covered the driver’s employer, which was only vicariously liable for the actions of its employee. GuideOne and Utica settled the underlying action, exhausting GuideOne’s primary and umbrella policies.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Continental Casualty Co. v. Phoenix Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1956
  2. City of Sacramento v. DrewCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  3. Popejoy v. HannonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Sequoia InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  5. Centennial Ins. Co. v. US Fire Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal · 2001

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hyundai Securities Co. v. Ik Chi LeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  2. Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, London v. Arch Specialty InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  3. Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, London v. Arch Specialty Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal · 2016
  4. Hyundai Securities v. LeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API