Legal Opinion

Harris v. Hammond

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided November 1, 1944No. 10841PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

McCORD, Circuit Judge.

This suit is by three former employees of the defendant to recover unpaid minimum wages, overtime compensation, liquidated damages, attorneys’ fees and costs under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 29 U.S.C.A. § 201 et seq.

The evidence is set out at length in a well considered opinion by the trial judge. Harris v. Hammond, D.C., 51 F.Supp. 91.

The question for decision is whether these employees are within the coverage of Sections 6 and 7 of the Act: “The provisions of sections 6 and 7 shall not apply with respect to (1) any employee employed in a bona fide * * *…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jax Beer Co. v. RedfernCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941
  2. Super-Cold Southwest Co. v. McBrideCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941
  3. Walling v. Goldblatt Bros.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1942
  4. White Motor Co. v. LittletonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941
  5. Harris v. HammondDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1943

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bowen v. New York News, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API