Legal Opinion

Harris v. Hammond

District Court, S.D. Georgia

Decided August 11, 1943No. Civil Action No. 176PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LOVETT, District Judge.

By consent of the parties this case was heard by the court as trier of the facts.

My findings and conclusions follow.

Facts.

The suit is by three former employees of defendant to recover unpaid minimum wages, overtime compensation, liquidated damages, attorney’s fees and costs under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 29 U.S.C.A. § 201 et seq.

Plaintiff McKey, who was paid $20 a week for his services, sues for overtime compensation, etc., from October 23, 1938, to December 24, 1939, alleging he worked 75 hours each week during that period. The plaintiff Harris, paid $11…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. United States v. American Trucking AssociationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. United States v. DarbySupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. A. B. Kirschbaum Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. Walling v. Jacksonville Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  5. Higgins v. Carr Brothers Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bowen v. New York News, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1973
  2. Harris v. HammondCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API