Legal Opinion
Reichert v. Jerry Reece, Inc.
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided December 18, 1973No. 9498PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TITUS, Chief Judge.
The multipartite question is: Was claimant (for the purposes of workmen’s compensation benefits) the “employee” 1 of Jerry Reece, Inc. (Reece), or Sam Tanksley Trucking, Inc. (Tanksley), or both, when he sustained an accidental injury on March 31, 1969, and, if he was an employee of Tanksley, is Tanksley relieved of liability under §§ 287.420 and 287.430, or both 2 The Division of Workmen’s Compensation concluded Tanksley was the sole employer with no outs under the foregoing sections. In turn, the Industrial Commission and the Circuit Court of Pemiscot County agreed,…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Pruitt v. HarkerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1931
- Ellegood v. Brashear Freight Lines, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1942
- McFarland v. Dixie MacHinery & Equipment Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1941
- Ozan Lumber Company v. McNeelySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1949
- Lawson v. LawsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1967
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Aquila, Inc. v. C.W. MiningCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- Matkins v. Zero Refrigerated Lines, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1979
- Miller v. Hirschbach Motor Lines, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1986
- Porter v. Erickson Transport Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1993
- Blair v. Associated Wholesale Grocers, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1980
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.