Legal Opinion

Peel v. Peel

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 17, 1931No. Appeal, 4PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

Appellant, Matthew Peel, in his bill prays that his wife, Margaret Peel, from whom he has been separated since 1928, be declared a trustee for two separate properties situate in the 23d Ward of the City of Pittsburgh, each fully described in the bill, purchased in 1903 and 1920 respectively, and to which title was taken in defendant’s name. Appellant bases his claim on an alleged oral antenuptial agreement with his wife, under which they agreed to purchase real estate and take title thereto by entireties, the agreement providing that both husband and wife Avould contribute to the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Belmont Laboratories, Inc. v. HeistSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  2. Nixon's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1870

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Potoczny v. DydekSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  2. Bratsch v. McCarthySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  3. Jennings v. EverettSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  4. Stalwart Building & Loan Ass'n v. MonahanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API