Bagley v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BURGESS, Justice.
Audrey Eldon Bagley plead guilty to a jury of the offense of Aggravated Rape. The jury assessed his punishment at 50 years confinement in the Texas Department of Corrections. Mr. Bagley was represented at the trial by qualified, competent counsel. He is represented on appeal by one of those trial counsel. Mr. Bagley has filed with this court a pro se “brief”. There is no right to hybrid representation. The pro se brief presents nothing for review. Rudd v. State, 616 S.W.2d 623 (Tex.Crim.App.1981). We will consider the six grounds of error alleged in counsel’s brief.
The…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Rudd v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
- Rumbaugh v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
- Beck v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
- Thompson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
- Allen v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bagley v. CollinsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
- Bagley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
- Ellis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1987
- Allen Alvin Lee, Jr. v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2002