Legal Opinion

Durham v. Walters

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 7, 1984No. 653, September Term, 1983PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARRITY, Judge.

Paul Durham and others (the appellants), who are heirs at law of Orville Oscar Outten, appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Worcester County granting a motion to dismiss caveat proceedings. The circuit court held that, in the absence of fraud, heirs at law could not challenge the will of the decedent by filing a petition to caveat the will more than six months following the first appointment of a personal representative under the will.

On appeal, the appellants present the following questions:

1. Whether the provisions of the Maryland Estates and Trusts Code Ann. §…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Garrison v. HillCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1895
  3. Meyer v. HendersonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1899
  4. Emmert v. StoufferCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1886
  5. Johns Hopkins Hospital v. LehningerCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1981

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Equitable Life Assurance Society v. JalowskyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  2. Hampton v. University of MarylandCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1996
  3. Sherman v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
  4. Green v. NelsonCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2016
  5. Markert v. BeatleyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API