Legal Opinion

La Salle National Bank v. Tolu Rock & Rye Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 12, 1884PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Rollin’ S. Williamson, Judge, presiding. This was assumpsit brought by the La Salle Rational Bank as indorsee and holder of a bill of exchange, alleged to have been drawn by the He Steiger Glass Company on the Tolu Rock and Rye Company, and accepted by the latter. The instrument was as follows: : $825.00. “Office of De Steiger Glass Company La Salle Ill.

Read the full summary

Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Rollin’ S. Williamson, Judge, presiding. This was assumpsit brought by the La Salle Rational Bank as indorsee and holder of a bill of exchange, alleged to have been drawn by the He Steiger Glass Company on the Tolu Rock and Rye Company, and accepted by the latter. The instrument was as follows: : $825.00. “Office of De Steiger Glass Company La Salle Ill. Dec. 13, 1882. Manufacturers of Window Glass, Glass Ware, Fruit Jars, &c. “Thirty days after date, pay to the order of ourself eight hundred and twenty-five dollars with exchange, value…

1Opinion of the CourtWilson, J.

As to the action of the court in rejecting the draft when offered alone, it is unnecessary to express any opinion. The decisions upon the construction and interpretation of commercial instruments purporting to be executed by one in a representative capacity, are almost infinite in number and variety, some of them being seemingly in conflict with each other, while many are so near the border line as to make it seem they might as appropriately fall on one side as the other.

The only question we shall consider is, as to whether the draft, taken in connection with the parol evidence offered, was…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Mechanics' Bank v. Bank of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1820
  2. Metcalf v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  3. Dubois v. Delaware & Hudson Canal Co.New York Supreme Court · 1830
  4. Story v. ElliotCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1827
  5. Dawes v. BoylstonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1812

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Wiers v. TreeseSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  2. McNeil v. Shober & Carqueville Lithographing Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Miers v. CoatesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1895
  4. Northeastern Coal Co. v. TyrrellAppellate Court of Illinois · 1907
  5. Chaney v. Home, Frontier & Foreign Missionary Society of United Brethren in ChristAppellate Court of Illinois · 1888

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API