Legal Opinion

Hamilton v. Dannenberg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 3, 1933PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

This action was instituted against defendant, an attorney at law, for damages resulting from his failure to proceed to trial with an action to recover damages for negligence, which plaintiff commenced against the Broadway-170th Street Holding Corporation. The personal injury action was dismissed for failure to prosecute. The Statute of Limitations had run in the meantime and, as a consequence, further proceedings were barred.

Plaintiff here seeks a recovery upon two independent theories,(1) in tort based upon negligence on the part of this defendant;(2) in contract for breach of contract of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Schmitt v. McMillanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Siegel v. KranisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
  2. Grago v. RobertsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
  3. Harding v. BellOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Glens Falls Insurance v. ReynoldsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957
  5. Greenwald v. ZyvithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API