Bell-Wayland Co. v. Nixon
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from County Court, Garvin County; W. R. Wallace, Judge. Garnishment proceeding by the Bell-Wayland Company against F. C. Nixon. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
HOOKER, C.
On the 21st day of September, 1911, the plaintiff in error instituted suit in a justice’s court of Garvin county to recover a judgment against E. M. Armstrong and L. P. Dyer, doing business under the name of E. M. Armstrong & Co., for the sum of $199.47. On the 30th day of September, 1911, judgmenc was rendered in said action in favor of the plaintiff in error and against said defendants for said sum.
On the 15th day of November, 1911, a garnishee summons was issued in said court in said action, and same was served upon the defendant in error, F. C. Nixon, and thereafter,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Board of Education v. ScovilleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1874
- Fooshee Brunson v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- A. J. Harwi Hardware Co. v. KlippertSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903
- Madden v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
- Spaulding Mfg. Co. v. WitterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
3Cited by6 opinions
- Moral Insurance Co. v. StevesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
- American Employers' Insurance Co. v. McGeeheeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1971
- Jarecki Manufacturing Co. v. FlemingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Indiahoma Refining Co. v. KunklerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Brown v. Butler State BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.