Legal Opinion

State v. Frederick

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 17, 1976No. 764SC427PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS, Judge.

In its first assignment of error, the State contends that the trial court erred in its finding that the search of the car was in violation of defendant’s constitutional rights. The search warrant involved in this case states, inter alia:

“The applicant swears to the following facts to establish probable cause for the issuance of a search warrant: Af- fiant states that he has received numerous calls stating he has firearms in trunk of veh., and when asked if officer could look in the trunk, he refused to allow it.”

The State concedes that the search warrant was defective, but…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. Chambers v. MaroneySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. BunnCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  2. State v. StylesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  3. State v. MacKeyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  4. State v. StylesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API