Legal Opinion
Benefits Concepts v. MacEra
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided June 6, 2005No. Civ.A. 04-183Published
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
DALZELL, District Judge.
This case requires us to determine the effect of a Pennsylvania insurance statute on an employee benefit plan’s subrogation rights. The parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment 1 are before us.
Factual Background 2
On April 1, 1997, Howard E. Dade, Sr. caused an automobile accident in which Carmelann Macera’s back and left shoulder were injured. At the time of the accident, Allstate Insurance Company (“Allstate”) provided automobile insurance to Dade. 3 See Pl.’s Mem. Ex. I.
Macera had her own automobile insurance policy with Allstate, which provided up to…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. McClendonSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.