Legal Opinion

Greenberg v. Stevens

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 17, 1904No. Gen. No. 11,204PublishedCited by 2 opinions

■Action of replevin. Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon, Jonas HuTchinson, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1903,

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stein

This was replevin by appellee against appellants with a count in trover. There was no property recovered on the replevin writ, and the return thereon so showed.

To the declaration appellants pleaded non cepit, non cletinet, not guilty as to the count in trover, and a plea averring that appellant Greenberg, being a constable, had taken the property in question in pursuance of a levy thereon under an execution against O. W. Freese, and that the property belonged to said Freese. A trial by jury resulted in a verdict of guilty against both appellants, and appellee’s damages were assessed at…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Snydacker v. BrosseIllinois Supreme Court · 1869
  2. Hefner v. VandolahIllinois Supreme Court · 1871
  3. Clark v. LewisIllinois Supreme Court · 1864
  4. Tuttle v. RobinsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
  5. Hardy v. KeelerIllinois Supreme Court · 1870

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rudnick v. ShoenbergSupreme Court of Delaware · 1923
  2. Rifkin & Hart, Inc. v. S. Buchsbaum & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API