Legal Opinion
People v. Moody
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 16, 1993PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment affirmed. Memorandum: We reject defendant’s contention that County Court should have given an adverse inference charge with respect to a missing composite drawing of the robber, drawn from a description provided by the bank teller who had been held up. Although the drawing should have been disclosed before trial (see, CPL 240.20 [1] [d]), the court properly considered the circumstances surrounding its disappearance. We agree that defendant was not prejudiced by its nondisclosure. The bank teller testified at trial and was subjected to vigorous cross-examination concerning the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. FieldsNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- People v. FieldsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- People v. StrewlAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
- People v. StrewlNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. AsheAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
- People v. FaulkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
- Commonwealth v. SilvaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2019
- People v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Dumas v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.