Legal Opinion

Joseph v. Donovan

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided February 6, 1934PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAvdey, J.

This case has been before us on two previous occasions. The first was an appeal taken by the plaintiffs from a judgment of nonsuit (Joseph v. Donovan, 114 Conn. 79, 157 Atl. 638) and we there held that the plaintiff had a valid judgment hen which attached to the interest of Donovan in the premises at the time the attachment was made, and which was enforceable to the extent of the interest he had after he had acquired title; and, accordingly, we reversed the judgment and remanded the cause to be proceeded with according to law. The second appearance (Joseph v. Donovan, 116 Conn. 160, 164 Atl.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Roby v. Bismarck National BankNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Dillon v. ByrneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1855
  3. McIsaac v. HaleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
  4. Joseph v. DonovanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
  5. Wilson v. LubkeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1903

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rommell v. WalshSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
  2. Wendland v. Ridgefield Construction Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  3. O'Donnell v. Police CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API