Baesler v. North Dakota Department of Transportation
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
KAPSNER, Justice.
[¶ 1] Wade Baesler appeals from a district court judgment affirming a Department of Transportation order suspending his driving privileges for 180 days. Because the Department failed to transmit a record compiled in the administrative proceedings, there is no evidence to support the Department’s exercise of jurisdiction to suspend Baesler’s license. We reverse.
I
[¶ 2] According to the Department’s hearing officer’s decision, on December 24, 2010, the Hettinger County Sheriffs Office issued Baesler a temporary operator’s permit based on an alcohol-related traffic offense that…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Peterson v. ZerrNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
- Schwind v. Director, North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
- Medical Arts Clinic, P.C. v. Franciscan Initiatives, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
- May v. SprynczynatykNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- Hartleib v. SimesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Schlittenhart v. North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
- Schlittenhart v. N.D. Dep't of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
- Bayles v. North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. MarsetteNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012