Kirby Lumber Co. v. Adams
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion
*369On Rehearing.
COMBS, Justice.
On motion for rehearing a majority have reached the conclusion that our court was in error in holding that the Eva Lancaster certificate was not legally floated. Chief Justice WALKER dissents from this view, believing that the original holding is correct.
The Eva Lancaster certificate was floated April 14, 1891. The statute in force at that time relating to the floating of land certificates was article 3888, R. S. 1879 (as amended by Acts of 1879 [Sp. Sess.] p. 20, c. 23). This article became article 4124 of Revised Statutes 1895, and is as follows: “Art. 4124.…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Commissioner of the General Land Office v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1849
- Adams v. Houston & Texas Central Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1888
- Logan v. Curry and ArnoldTexas Supreme Court · 1902
- New York and Texas Land Co. v. ThomsonTexas Supreme Court · 1891
- Johnston v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1858
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.