Legal Opinion

Cochran v. Burdick

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided April 2, 1934No. 6024PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAN ORSDEL, Associate Justice.

This appeal is from a decree of the court below dismissing appellant’s bill in equity for an accounting.

It appears that the plaintiff is a lawyer, maintaining an office in Washington, admitted to practice before the Court of Appeals of the District and the Department of the Interior, but not in the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia. He entered into a contract with the defendant Burdick, a New York lawyer, to prepare and file the necessary petitions in the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia in some forty-seven war minerals claims, in which Burdick…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Calvert v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1854
  2. Arlington Hotel Co. v. EwingTennessee Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Dingman v. HenryCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1922
  4. Stockman v. FaganCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1928

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Spanos v. Skouras Theatres CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1964
  2. Wedtech Corp. v. Nofziger (In Re Wedtech Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1988
  3. Michigan Millers Mut. Fire Ins. Co. v. CANADIAN NORTH. RY. CO.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1945
  4. Allman v. WinkelmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939
  5. Nick C. Spanos v. Skouras Theatres Corporation, Theatre & Cinema, Inc., Philhamboro, Inc., Youngstown Theatre Corporation and Modern Playhouses, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API