Legal Opinion

Allman v. Winkelman

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 16, 1939No. 8870PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DENMAN, Circuit Judge.

This ie an appeal from an adjudication in equity of the United States Court for China that a contract o.f “partnership for the general practice of law” in Shanghai and elsewhere in China, made between appellant and appellee is “illegal, void, contrary to public policy and not enforceable” and decreeing a rescission of the contract and awarding as damages to plaintiff the consideration paid by him to defendant for entering into the contract less benefits received by plaintiff from the joint practice under the “void” agreement.

In the briefs and argument here the contending…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Steele v. DrummondSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Cochran v. BurdickDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1937
  3. Cochran v. BurdickCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1934

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Kerr-McGee Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978
  2. George v. CatonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. Hillerich & Bradsby Co. v. MacKayDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1998
  4. Westinghouse Electric Corporation v. Kerr-M CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API