Legal Opinion · Dissent

Wanzek Construction, Inc. v. Employers Insurance of Wausau

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 19, 2003No. C4-03-165Published

1DissentForsberg, Judge

I concur with the majority opinion, but I respectfully dissent regarding the subcontractor issue. I believe Sterling Custom Homes Corp. v. Comm’r of Revenue, 391 N.W.2d 523 (Minn.1986), is on point and controlling. In Sterling, the supreme court defined the term “subcontractor.”

The terms contractor and subcontractor are not applicable to persons who merely sell tangible personal property in the form of budding materials, supplies, or equipment to construction contractors, for delivery at the job site without any requirement that they install such tangible personal property.

Id. at 524 (quoting…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Weyerhaeuser Company v. Twin City Millwork Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
  2. Sterling Custom Homes Corp. v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API