Legal Opinion

State ex rel. A.W.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided September 25, 2012PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hoens

More than a decade ago, this Court established the framework for our trial courts to use when deciding whether a confession given by a juvenile in a custodial setting was voluntary and therefore admissible in a delinquency proceeding. See State v. Presha, 163 N.J. 304, 312-17, 748 A.2d 1108 (2000). Among the wide variety of factors that bear on an evaluation of voluntariness, we considered the role played by a juvenile’s parent during questioning and we addressed the implications of the parent’s absence from an interrogation. Id. at 314-17, 748 A.2d 1108. In establishing the analytical…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. State v. HendersonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2011
  3. New Jersey Division of Youth & Family Services v. M.C.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2010
  4. State v. MillerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1978
  5. State v. PreshaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2000

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. STATE IN THE INTEREST OF A.F. (FJ-11-0116-18, MERCER COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (RECORD IMPOUNDED)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2018
  2. STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. CARLOS R. BELAUNDE (16-03-0219, PASSAIC COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (RECORD IMPOUNDED)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2019
  3. STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. EVENS DUMAS (15-04-0466, BERGEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API