State ex rel. A.W.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hoens
More than a decade ago, this Court established the framework for our trial courts to use when deciding whether a confession given by a juvenile in a custodial setting was voluntary and therefore admissible in a delinquency proceeding. See State v. Presha, 163 N.J. 304, 312-17, 748 A.2d 1108 (2000). Among the wide variety of factors that bear on an evaluation of voluntariness, we considered the role played by a juvenile’s parent during questioning and we addressed the implications of the parent’s absence from an interrogation. Id. at 314-17, 748 A.2d 1108. In establishing the analytical…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- State v. HendersonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2011
- New Jersey Division of Youth & Family Services v. M.C.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2010
- State v. MillerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1978
- State v. PreshaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2000
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- STATE IN THE INTEREST OF A.F. (FJ-11-0116-18, MERCER COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (RECORD IMPOUNDED)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2018
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. CARLOS R. BELAUNDE (16-03-0219, PASSAIC COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (RECORD IMPOUNDED)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2019
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. EVENS DUMAS (15-04-0466, BERGEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2020