Legal Opinion

Miller v. United Automax

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 2005No. W2003-01394-SC-R11-CVPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

OPINION

2Opinion of the Court · BarkerWilliam M. Barker, J.

in which FRANK F. DROWOTA, III, C.J., and E. RILEY ANDERSON, ADOLPHO A. BIRCH, JR., and JANICE M. HOLDER, JJ., joined.

This case arises out of the sale of a used car which Plaintiffs, the buyers of the car, maintain was damaged prior to sale despite Defendant’s denial of damage. A jury found for Plaintiffs, the buyers, on their claims for both common law intentional misrepresentation ánd for violation of the Tennessee Consumer Protection Act, Tennessee Code Annotated section 47-18-101 et seq. (1995). Plaintiffs elected to receive the punitive damages awarded by the jury under the common…

3Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Union Carbide Corp. v. HuddlestonTennessee Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Concrete Spaces, Inc. v. SenderTennessee Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Killingsworth v. Ted Russell Ford, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2003
  4. Allied Sound, Inc. v. NeelyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1995
  5. Wimley v. RudolphTennessee Supreme Court · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by16 opinions

  1. Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc. v. EppersonTennessee Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Killingsworth v. Ted Russell Ford, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Austin v. Stokes-Craven Holding Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
  4. Adkins v. CollensAlaska Supreme Court · 2019
  5. Austin v. Stokes-Craven Holding Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2010

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API