Legal Opinion

Hood v. McCarthy

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided May 29, 1967No. 6407PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYesley, J.

This is an action in four counts to recover á deposit paid under an agreement for the purchase by the plaintiffs, and the sale to them by the defendant trustees, of a commercial property located on Middlesex Street, in Lowell. In counts 1 and 3 William H. Hood is the plaintiff and John C. McCarthy, trustee, the defendant. In counts 2 and 4 James H. Rush is the plaintiff and Sandra A. McCarthy, trustee, the defendant.

The defendants denied the allegations of the *143declaration and asserted specially that the plaintiffs breached their agreement to buy. There was a finding for the defendants.

There…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hoffman v. City of ChelseaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  2. Barton v. City of CambridgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
  3. Baker v. JewellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1810
  4. Beck v. DooreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
  5. King v. MillikenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Lechiara v. AmatoMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1980
  2. Powers v. CaplanMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1985
  3. Cohen v. HaynesMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1980
  4. Cohen v. WeinerMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1981
  5. Cohen v. Weiner & Glover Realty, Inc.Massachusetts District Court · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API