Legal Opinion

Cohen v. Haynes

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided January 31, 1980PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWelsh, J.

This is a civil action sounding in contract for the recovery of rent alleged to be due from May, 1977 through December, 1977. The demised premises consisted of *23an apartment occupied by the defendant as her residence.

The defendant, who appeared and defended the action pro se in the trial court, filed an answer which was essentially a general denial and a plea of payment.2

After trial, the court found for the defendant. The plaintiff duly filed requests for rulings, which were denied by the court, and timely filed a request for a report. A draft report was also seasonably filed by the plaintiff.

W…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Calcagno v. P. H. Graham & Sons Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  2. Santosuosso v. DellaRussoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  3. Hood v. McCarthyMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1967
  4. Kilroy v. JoyceMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1953

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Powers v. CaplanMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1985
  2. Rood v. TolleyMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API